Still need help?
Get in touch with the LX.lab team by logging a ticket via ServiceConnect. We'll be in touch shortly.
Log a ticketWant to provide feedback on this resource? Please log in first via the top nav menu.
This resource provides comprehensive information on setting out criteria for video assessments.
This resource should be read alongside the Rubric decisions before you start your video assessment resource.
You can employ a model like Schwartz and Hartman’s to determine the type or genre of video you want student’s to produce and the appropriate way to assess it in line with your desired outcomes.
Using this model and formula can be a great way to make it clear to yourself and your students what you want them to achieve.
Example of a formula to help utilise the wheel (I want students to demonstrate 1 by means of 4 in order to learn 2 and be assessed in terms of 3).
The criteria topics are based on the UTS Graduate Attributes which have been contextualised by some key categories for video assessment.
The example criteria are based upon a mix of Course Intended Learning Outcomes, Subject Learning Objectives and specific areas of communication in video assessment. They have also been refined by feedback from academics who offer video assessments in their subjects.
The Outcome categories and Example criteria, competencies and evidence are not prescriptive. Consider them a kind of shopping list that you may want to select from or add to based upon the needs of your assessment.
These criteria can be adapted for use in either an analytical or holistic rubric.
Four high level attributes – Audiovisual language and communication, Ethics, Discipline knowledge and professional readiness and Interpersonal communication – make up the base level for video assessment criteria. The tabs below each high level attribute denote Outcome categories. Click on the tabs to see example criteria, competencies and evidence, example genres, and learning targets and classes of outcomes.
This high-level attribute relates to the Graduate Attributes of Communication and Critical thinking and creativity.
It covers anything from visual and audio design and aesthetics to planning and organisation.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Video pitch, project summary, report, case study, news report, historical presentation, podcast, all genres are possible.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Seeing, Engaging, Doing, Saying
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Location/environmental mapping in DAB, software demonstrations/screencasts in FEIT, training videos, trend reports, Tour, Portrayal, Point of view.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Seeing – familiarity and recognition, Discernment and Noticing, Doing – Skills and Performance
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Topic report, pitch, storyboarding, script writing, news report, – all genres are possible.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Seeing, Engaging, Doing, Saying.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Video CV/Portfolio, short film in FASS, science communications on social media – all genres are possible.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Seeing, Engaging, Doing, Saying.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Evidence of process – treatment, script, storyboard or transcript, reflection etc.
Example genres:
Investigative report, stakeholder brief, video diaries, storyboards – all genres are possible.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Seeing, Engaging, Doing, Saying.
Ethics is one of the Graduate Attributes involved in video assessment.
Ethics in video assessment refers to social responsibility and representation along with digital accessibility and academic integrity.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Investigative report, creating teaching materials, stakeholder interviews, point of view, ad, trailer, trigger, narrative, anchor, association, chronicle, analogy, commentary, expository.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Seeing: Discernment & Noticing
Saying: Inference and Explanation
Engaging: Contextualise and Future Learning
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
This Graduate Attribute area covers critical thinking and creativity, discipline knowledge, professional readiness, and the Indigenous Graduate Attribute. The categories are designed to help students consider the audience and conventions specific to the genre of video.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Self-evaluations, reflective practice, video pitch, project report – all genres are possible.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Seeing, Engaging, Doing, Saying.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Public service announcement in Health, ad, trailer, trigger, association, chronicle, narrative, anchor, analogy.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Saying: Facts and Recall, Inference and Explanations
Engaging: Interest & Preferences
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Consultation summary, client report, all genres are possible.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Multimodal campaign project in BUS, narrative, anchor, trigger, trailer, ad.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Engaging: Contextualise & Future Learning
This includes communication that relates to collaboration and teamwork but also the actual personal presentation appropriate for a given video genre.
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example criteria, competencies and evidence:
Example genres:
Video pitch/presentation, commentary, expository, modelling, identification, demonstration, step-by-step.
Learning targets and classes of outcomes:
Doing: Manner and Attitude
When writing criteria, simply asking questions like “Can I provide examples of what success looks like based upon the goal of the video task?” will help clarify what needs to go into criteria.
Download the attached spreadsheet to help you start building your criteria.
Instructions on how to use the spreadsheet:
Access the criteria building file.
Want to see an example of a video rubric design based upon our criteria? Take a look at the Sample Rubric for a Video Assessment.
Keep in mind that this rubric is just a sample and is not ready for your specific discipline and context. To get help building your rubric, get in touch with the Teaching and Curriculum Team (TACT).
Kilgour, P., Northcote, M., Williams, A. & Kilgour, A., (2020) A plan for the co-construction and collaborative use of rubrics for student learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45:1, 140-153.
Schwartz, D. L., & Hartman, K. (2007). It is not television anymore: Designing digital video for learning and assessment. Video research in the learning sciences, 335-348.
Get in touch with the LX.lab team by logging a ticket via ServiceConnect. We'll be in touch shortly.
Log a ticketWant to provide feedback on this resource? Please log in first via the top nav menu.